On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:20:40PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > kernel-latest-2.6-hppa 2.6.8-1 > source hppa unstable > 1 month Kyle McMartin > > debian-kernel managed kernel-image tracker packages seem to be called > kernel-image-$ver-$subarch (e.g. kernel-image-2.6-686). Debian should strive > to unify this as much as possible. REJECT. No wait, REJECTing this out of > hand would lead to a pissed maintainer filling FMs mailbox. FMs are not > debian-mentor, just let it rot, perhaps someone can clue him in... >
Excuse me? Last I looked, I was in a far better position to judge what should and shouldn't be. Don't see you in LDAP, nor in NM... Perhaps you should sod off and keep your arm chair commentary to a minimum. Where did I leave that surgical clue by four... If you had actually _looked_ before you opened your dumb mouth, you'd notice the difference between a source and binary package, and see that all kernel-latest-2.6 provides is transition packages. To make you look even more stupid, why don't you take a look in the archive? http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=kernel-latest&searchon=sourcenames&subword=1&version=all&release=all What's this? Other architectures doing the same thing? Better clue all them in too! Lots of love, Kyle M. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]