Le dimanche 20 mars 2005 à 12:45 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit : > Hello, Hi Sven,
> This is an attempt to do a vancouver-counter proposal in such a way that would > be acceptable to all, including the folk who was at the vancouver meeting. > Please be resonable when we post here, refrain from agressive behavior, and > provide argumentation to your proposed solutions. Your proposal makes sense of course, and I'm sure it will be well accepted... furthermore I think that this was the intent behind the Vancouver proposal even if it wasn't worded very well. Debian as a whole shouldn't suffer from minority arches. So we decide to refuse most of the constraints imposed by the minority arches... this way the release team shouldn't pester porter until they setup an rbuilder for security uploads or a supplementary buildd. Instead they just say : if you want to release together with tier1 arches, you have to meet those criteria at that date. I believe everyone is supportive of the various ports, nobody has any interest in making a port fail... but it's clear that many maintainers are frustrated to be blocked because their package doesn't build on an arch they don't care about. So your proposal conciles everybody and I hope it will be mostly ok for everybody. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com Earn money with free software: http://www.geniustrader.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
