* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050319 18:40]: > On Mar 19, Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What's wrong with splitting into ftp-full-monty.d.o, carrying all archs, > > including the popular ones, and ftp.d.o, carrying only the most popular > > subset? This way, there's no need to mirror from both of them, and > > duplication is kept to a minimum. Slightly increased traffic from the > > fullblown server is the only drawback I see compared to the ports > > proposal.
> That on some servers I'd like to mirror both archives, and I'd rather > not waste a few GB on duplicated files. I don't know if it's a good idea, but it might make use to write a customized "mirror" script that just creates the appropriate symlinks on the partial mirrors on your machine again. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
