On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:06:15PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > [1] The installer might be a point, but since all sarge architectures > > will have a working installer and I hope there's not another > > installer rewrite planned for etch this shouldn't be a big issue. > > This is still an issue. Joey Hess's mails have indicated very clearly that > it's > difficult to get an installer release out even when all arches are already > supported.
This is a non-issue. The main problem was the kernel situation, which will be streamlined for etch into a single package, and maybe build issues, which could be solved by a separate build queue or priority for d-i issues. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
