On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:00:45PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Both of these are plausible; the difference is whether you autobuild > > from unstable or testing. I would prefer the former, which means your > > former case. > > Autobuilding from testing won't work well AFAICS, as it introduces > another delay until rc-<arch> bugs are found. Building packages with > generic RC bugs and ignore them for subtesting seems to be the lesser > evil.
I disagree here, since building from testing means not duplicating all the job done in tier-1 testing. My project called for a per-arch override, uploading directly to arch-unstable, in case of stals and such. Also, building from testing makes synchronizing with tier-1 testing for an arch stable release easier. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
