It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old version. I'd rather have an install package for fwtk (as we have to netscape) that creates a local 2.0 package if you have the sources.
Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44 Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 >-----Original Message----- >From: Jason Gunthorpe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:47 AM >To: Michael Meskes >Cc: Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt. >Subject: Re: fwtk should be removed IMO > > > >On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> We still distribute version 1.3 which is outdated. The actual version is >> 2.0. I tried contacting TIS and got this replay: >> >> ... >> In summary, you cannot: >> * give the software to anyone, period >> * put a copy of the software on an ftp site (i.e. mirror) >> * distribute it in any form >> >> I think we should remove fwtk completely. > >Please don't, it still has a very usefull FTP and Telnet proxy. Plug-GW is >also handy at times. > >Jason > > >-- >TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] . >Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
