* Steve Langasek wrote: > The much larger consequence of this meeting, however, has been the > crafting of a prospective release plan for etch.
Thanks to the team for your work on that. I support the direction of the proposal itself (modulo minor issues) and I hope that Debian reckognizes that it is not a shame if such things are worked out in a small team. It is plainly impossible to work out such a plan in a reasonable time when each and every of our thousand developers wants a say in it. I happily delegate my voice to a small team for quick and high quality decisions. While I believe that Debians distributed packaging model with the packagers being the more or less ultimate authority over decisions regarding the package, I like to see a more structured approach when it comes to making overall decisions. Regards, Sebastian -- PGP-Key: http://www.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de/~sebastian.ley/public.key Fingerprint: A46A 753F AEDC 2C01 BE6E F6DB 97E0 3309 9FD6 E3E6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
