Scripsit Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, Henning Makholm wrote:
>>> Nothing's going to prevent porters from adding stable-security (or >>> whatever) to their autobuilders, >> True - for as long as they do not try to upload the result to the >> Debian archive, which will carry only "unstable". > I do not consider this to be set in stone. It is, however, explicitly stated in the plan we're discussing. > The people who were at the meeting agreed on some things. And I'm saying that what they agreed on is wrong and harmful to the project. I'm saying that they should reconsider their decision. > Therefore the result of the meeting is in no way binding on > anybody. (This is regardless of the fact that the people responsible > for it *did* say that the proposal is ... well, exactly that.) Half of the ftp-master team are signers of the decision. If they decide to kick testing and stable for the lesser architectures out of the archive, it doesn't really matter whether their decision is formally binding on anybody else. -- Henning Makholm "The Board views the endemic use of PowerPoint briefing slides instead of technical papers as an illustration of the problematic methods of technical communicaion at NASA." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]