On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:29:06PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2005 03:09, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Soon everyone loves you, and you get a huge userbase, and hit 10% of > > i386+amd64 downloads or five times powerpc's current userbase or so, and > > say "I wanna be on ftp.d.o!!" Then you get moved across over a month or > > so, and become a "tier-1" arch. Yay you. > > If I read the proposal (and Steves explanations) right, ftp.d.o mirroring and > tier-1 are not coupled. You seem to imply that. Please clarify.
It seems to be mainly a problem with various names floating around. In aj's mail "tier-1" seems to mean "ftp.d.o arch" _not_ "released arch" which he discusses one paragraph earlier. So the clarification: ftp.d.o mirroring and release status are not strongly coupled (but probably only released archs will become ftp.d.o archs...). Just don't use words like "tier-1" that aren't defined in the mail ;) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
