On Monday 14 March 2005 19:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I think the only criteria m68k fails are the "2 buildds have to > suffice to keep up with etch" and the "10% download shares".
The second criterion is only for the mirror network, not for tier-1. Please read the Nybbles proposal again: " the list of release candidate architectures will be further split, with only the most popular ones distributed via ftp.debian.org itself. The criterion for being distributed from ftp.debian.org (and its mirrors) is roughly: - there must be a sufficient user base to justify inclusion on all mirrors, defined as 10% of downloads over a sampled set of mirrors " Does m68k have developers to support d-i and support from the security team? Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;) -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
