On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2005, you wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:37:31PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > > > > >The s390 porting team can perfectly well do what the hurd-i386 porting > > > > >team does: build them themselves. I mean, umm, you don't have to be > > > > >hooked into w-b to upload packages. > > > > Why are some architectures refused the same service that others get? > > > You have to ask w-b for that one. But regardless, which is better? > > > Do nothing, because w-b isn't doing what s390 wants, or deal with it > > > oneself? Instead of fighting about who should solve the problems, why > > > not solve it? > > > > It's the job of w-b admins to add new buildds in a timely manner. If they > > don't do that, they simply fail (one significant part of) their job. > or they just have their reasons not to do. if so, why they don't share them with us instead of saying no?
-- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
