-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's very Ubuntu-centric. What about the others ? I'm not >> specifically speaking of Ubuntu here. You can add Project Scud to the >> list, if you'd like. > > Got a more specific example or are you just going to keep throwing conspiracy > theories around? Throwing around, there's something going on behind the scene that needs to be found and revealed. >> At least back then we weren't trying to reduce the set of >> architectures we support to match theirs. > > This isn't about matching with Debian-derivatives. This is about the load > placed on the people doing the actual work. Are you paying attention to what > the Release Managers, D-I Lead, and FTP Masters are saying? Or are you just > assuming that they're out to get you? Yes, I do pay attention. I also pay attention when some of them tell us they don't want help. >> And keeping IA64 in the loop is just another joke from the release >> team. It'd be interesting to find out, but I bet more m68ks were sold >> than IA64 last year. > > Oh no! Objective criteria! Whatever shall we do? Hide them as fast as we can, what else ? JB. - -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCNiCezWFP1/XWUWkRAmHnAJwLm1EWLHCumQnjKTRsCHnBxg5ujQCeInaI mYyeMhr0sOkosH8D4LiJi1c= =WlLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
