This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:03:30PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > > > > Thus the problem is less in the development and more in the support > > of testing requirements (all arches in sync) and stable support > > (security response time). Therefore the N<=2 requirement is only > > needed for tier-1 arches but not for the tier-2 which will not > > officially release a stable. > > What is the detailed reasoning for this requirement anyway ?
I thought that was fairly clear - a 12 day build of a security fix is unacceptable, especially since it hampers getting that fix out the door for everyone else. > And would a ten-way redundant distcc cluster count as one machine ? I would certainly interpret it that way, and hopefully the people behind the proposal would as well. Take care, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
pgpz6T0L5nV5U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
