Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:47:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The sh and hurd-i386 ports don't currently meet the SCC requirements, as > > > neither has a running autobuilder or is keeping up with new packages. > > > It is impossible for any port under development to meet the SCC > > requirements. We need a place for such ports. Where will it be? > > On the contrary, the amd64 port does, and is currently maintained > completely outside official debian.org infrastructure.
The amd64 port did not always. Ports under development take time; the amb64 port is at a late state in its development. I don't understand why autobuilding is important to SCC; maybe if you could explain that I would understand. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
