On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:47:51PM -0500, sean finney wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:18:19PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote: > > I seem to recall hearing that NEW processing is based solely on binary > > packages, so that the new source package would not need to go through NEW > > if it creates a binary package that is already in the archive. > > > > I couldn't find anything about this through google, though, so it may be > > best to upload to experimental first and see if your new packages go right > > in or not. > > istr the same thing, and was thinking that this might be the case. > since i don't suppose the ftp-master illuminati are going to come out > of hiding just to answer this question, i guess i'll upload, find out, > and report back :/
Given that some people might find offensive to be compared to illuminati, I don't think this is the best way to engage the ftp-master. YMMV. IIUC, the override file only contains binary packages names, so renaming/splitting a source package without altering the binaries packages produced should not need changes to the override file. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
