On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The version in experimental has -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, and it works > > > on files larger than 2GB, but I have only tested it on the i386 > > > architecture. > > Please use the value of $(getconf LFS_CFLAGS) instead; it appears (based on > > past exim4 bug reports) that using -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on natively 64-bit > > systems such as alpha causes surprising breakage of some glibc APIs. > Ok, will do that. > > > * Would the release managers approve this change for sarge? > > > > If this is the only change, yes. > Hmm, while we are at it, I think it would be good to fix #295604 as well. > This is the (trivial) patch: > diff -ru procmail-3.22.orig/src/header.h procmail-3.22/src/header.h > --- procmail-3.22.orig/src/header.h 1999-07-06 08:12:22.000000000 +0200 > +++ procmail-3.22/src/header.h 2005-02-17 00:34:47.000000000 +0100 > @@ -168,3 +168,5 @@ > X(readreceiptto, "Read-Receipt-To:") /* miscellaneous extension > */ > X(fakesender, "Fake-Sender:") > X(envelopeto, "Envelope-To:") /* exim extension > */ > +X(useragent, "User-Agent:") > +X(nntppostingdate, "NNTP-Posting-Date:") Looks straightforward, yes. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
