Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! The older versions were kept to ease the transition into a > minor API change, and to work around earlier gcc-induced tester > failures. There are just a few packages using the older API now. > I've filed wishlist bugs with those requesting an upgrade about 100 > days ago. How should we proceed now? Maintaining both sets is > becoming more burdensome.
Hi Camm, When we exchanged emails a while ago after your wishlist bug against libmathlib1, I think you were intending to have the old blas/lapack/etc. removed only after the release of Sarge. Is that still the case? It would make things difficult for me if blas/lapack/atlas2 disappeared now, since I would have to bump sonames on most of Cernlib, change library package names, and somehow get the new binary packages through NEW and into testing before the release. After Sarge, I have no objections. As far as I'm concerned you can have lapack99 removed right now, since it's not just one, but two sonames behind the current version. regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
