Em Ter, 2005-02-22 Ãs 15:28 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escreveu: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since this also makes autobuilding experimental harder, work is being > > > done to use ``apt-cache policy'' output to determine whether the right > > > version of a package is available and break off if not, but it's still > > > got some bugs (including situations where the build is broken off > > > because sbuild (incorrectly) thinks the right version of a package isn't > > > available). > > apt-get build-dep should be improved to be buildd useable > > instead. > > If you don't have patches, don't tell me how to do things.
While I agree with the core of your reasoning, I think you should approach Goswin's comments as advice, not as 'telling one how to do things'. Maybe we just need to learn how to use a more pleasant language =D. See ya, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://couve.no-ip.org/~kov/> Debian: <http://www.debian.org/> * <http://www.debian-br.org/>
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
