Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 21 Feb 2005 20:54:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> - security response time (more builds to do)
>>
>>Which DSAs came out later than they should have because of this
>>supposed delay? Nor could this possibly slow release.
>
> There are rumours that the noticeable multi-week gap last fall when no
> DSAs were released at all were caused by some buildd failure on one of
> the lesser-userd arches and the security team decided to defer
> advisories until security builds could be released for all arches.
>
> I have a dedicated opinion about this time of service the major arches
> received during this time, but I do not want to voice it here as I am
> only talking about a rumour and I do not want to start yet another
> flame war.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
On the other hand there have been DSAs where some archs where left out
and fixed later iirc.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
