On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote: > > So, what method do you prefer? Or do you have better ideas? How hard > > would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there > > other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy? > I strongly prefer method 1. I really think dpkg should be improved, > but as that doesn't seem to happen any time soon, I don't think > method 2 will hurt in the mean time. Anyone else see any problems > with method 2?
Better method: Remove the version from svgalib1g shlibs (as the other libc6 libraries have done). The version would be needed again if a new upstream release of svgalib with an incompatible library arrives, as this seems far from happening this would be a perfect solution for svgalib, IMO. -- Nicolás Lichtmaier.- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
