Clint Byrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, can someone please tell me how messages like the one below, and > others, aren't indicative that debian should drop s390, mipsel, and > maybe hppa from the list of architectures? How about we release for > i386, sparc, and powerpc, and let the others release on their own > schedule? [...] > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 05:49:24PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote: >> GTK+2.0 version 2.6.2 has been recently uploaded and it seems to fail to >> build on some buildds because they ran out of space. Currently it is the >> case of sparc, arm and s390 buildds.
If the build fails on sparc, arm, and s390, how should this be indicative that we should drop s390, mipsel, and hppa? [Steve Langasek] > Do you know how much build space might be saved by disabling the > testsuite for static libs on all architectures, instead of just on the > mipsen? Or because there might be a simple way to solve the problem? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
