> 5. Conflicts & Dependencies for hamm packages
>
[..]
>
> The hamm libfoo package has to depend on libc6 and has to conflict
> with libfoo-dev and libc5-dev.
Are you sure here? I'd say you mean this:
The hamm libfoo package has to depend on libc5 and has to conflict
with libfoo-dev.
- libfoo is libc5, so it should depend on libc5.
- Yes, we should try and get rid of libc5-dev, but I'm not sure it's
the job of random libries to force users to do that: as far as
I can see, nothing breaks when the two are installed together.
> 6. Handling bugfixes for Debian 1.3 (bo)
[..]
> ii) Any bo package for libfoo _has_ to conflict with libc6,
> libfoo-altdev and libfoog.
That's a bit late now. Maybe you mean "any newly uploaded bo libfoo package".
(we'd get a flood of bo bugs otherwise, against all bo libraries).
> iii)The libfoo-dev package has to conflict with libc5-altdev and
> has to depend on libc5-dev.
Again, better change that to "any newly uploaded libfoo-dev package".
And, the "conflict with libc5-altdev" seems redundant, as libc5-altdev
already conflicts with libc5-dev. And all old (bo) libcfoo-dev packages
should depend on libc5-dev anyway.
> [2] The location ../libc5-compat was introduced in the ldso package. As
> ldso is a package on all linus distributions we'll keep it for
s/linus/linux/
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
