also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.14.1933 +0100]: > You still need to deal with key revocation and a new key being > needed, anyway. Yearly changes will not make it more difficult, > it will make sure those codepaths are tested (and used at least > once an year).
I am not sure a key needs to be revoked, it should just have an expiry that forces us to release in time. :) Do we have code paths for certificate management? In that case, I wonder why it took so long this year... -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
