Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a reason for the checker libraries to come with debugging symbols?
Yes. There is a good, even a superlatively good reason: checker is for debugging programs. It is *only* for debugging programs. Thus, debugging symbols are in there intentionally. When something goes wrong, even in the C library, it helps an enormous amount if one can find the exact line in the source that causes the problem. Regrettably, one must have 300MB of source code online in order to do this, but that is the price we pay. > I haven't used checker yet, so I don't know. But I assume that the libraries > without debugging symbols would work. They would work. But it isn't The Right Thing To Do. -- Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.msu.edu/user/pfaffben PGP key: http://www.msu.edu/user/pfaffben/pgp.html or a keyserver near you Linux: choice of a GNU generation -- Debian GNU/Linux: the only free Linux -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
