[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Baker) writes: > > Guy Maor is the current maintainer of the "bash" package. However, > > he told us that he is offline for about 4 weeks. So I think > > someone else should grab it and upload a non-maintainer (interim) > > release. > > Is that necessary just to work round a (long standing) bug in > another program?
I don't care in the least about netrape, but one good reason for doing a non-maintainer release of bash would be to build it against glibc. I'm sure I'm not the only one who needs a libc6-based libreadline for some of my packages. Also, I'd imagine there were other bugs fixed in 2.01. -- James -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
