On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Christian Hudon wrote: > To make this clearer, the only thing that would happen it that exim would > be marked with priority 'important' and smail with priority 'extra'.. > > And yes, I think it'd be a good idea, assuming that exim's .forward syntax > is backward-compatible with sendmail/smail's syntax.
Which indeed it is. Tim. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T J R Cutts Tel: +44 1223 333596 Dept. of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Rd., Fax: +44 1223 766002 Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
