> packages as follows [1]. Some packages (mostly from base) may use
> locations in /lib.
>
> based on | package name | library location
> --------------------------------------------
> libc6 | libfoo | /usr/lib/libfoo.so.<ver>
> libc5 | libfoo-g | /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libfoo.so.<ver> [2]
Isn't that the other way around: the libc6 version with g, and the
libc5 version without? (This convention would ensure that somebody
with an old (from bo, libc5) libfoo and a new libfoo-g would have
the same library twice, and other libc6 packages couldn't just
depends: libfoo, cause there are now two libfoo's (a libc5 and a libc6 one).
> based on | package name | hierarchy locations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> libc6 | libfoo-dev | /usr/{lib,include}
> libc5 | libfoo-g-altdev | /usr/i486-linuxlibc1/{lib,include}
Here again, unless I'm really confused, the "g" is mixed up.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
