-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree with you on this. I personally believe that Debian should > relax this requirement about non-modifiable & redistributable code not > being suitable for the primary distribution. I've never seen how it > helps any cause other than sticking a finger in the eye of those who > might like to keep some medium of control over their work. The usual reasons (bug-fixes, porting, adding modified Makefiles, minor changes necessary to integrate a single package into a complete system, etc.) aside, what if an author gets run over by a car? There are "artistic control" measures such as ones adopted by the Perl Artistic License that allow distribution under the Debian policy. Dan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM5U2EKkybebRDjw1AQGvGgP9Fmnw0DXpqeH+THGhy8hJme6YMl5v+6oS kwip7IkOCwSTZiy9zJfB/34xxCGO/1zbu5BkQ9Dwoi1c6g+rk7BXHV19/T+Z01c7 jJ9lcx+e7yhHXkhltD479ZjXmaOkebHJ0XmzGu2s+XcE9ochXZpICNkFphb1bZfF GW1rzIUat98= =aVb+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
