On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:38:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> #290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However, >> after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge despite of the >> bug. >> >> What did we do wrong? > >You probably did open the bug before the dinstall run that installed >the new package. Therefor britney was confused and thought the bug would >apply to the package in sarge, too (as at the time it saw the bug the >first time the version in sid and sarge were identical). So the package >in sid wasn't more buggy than the one in sarge ...
I see. So we will wait two days before filing the dummy bug on eximdoc4 next time. Thanks for enlightening. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
