Hi, first I'd like to thank Kevin for his nice diagram!
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 20:38, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a > nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) ) but then I also got one concern, especially if this diagram gets used in more or less official debian projects / occasions / whatever (this might be a good place to add that I'm aware that Kevin started that diagram for hisself...) : unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on non-critical systems..." testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more stability..." I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be described as suited for desktops - they are development branches of debian, which are likely to break, which break and... so on. Most of you know :) I'm perfectly aware why some people advocate testing or sid for Desktops (the good ol' "debian releases to seldom" argument...) - but as said I don't think Debian should propagate this misconcepts. regards, Holger
