Mark Eichin wrote: > > > I just brought this up, since it was my understanding that if you > > want to write a commercial program (ie. not under the GPL), and > > link it against cygwin.dll, you've got to pay Cygnus $$$. Not all > > that different than the restrictions on Qt, really. > > Two questions: (1) in what way is cygwin32.dll different from libc5.so > in this regard (since the license for both is the same: GPL)
I believe libc5.so is LGPL... --Galen -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .