[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 05:00:12PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> >> Ah, you misinterpreted my point in quite an impressive way. Valid >> numbers or not, his statement was of the form "Here is how we do it, >> and our way is the only way in which it is possible to do it". And >> we've heard that one before. > >I really don't care about the numbers. I don't actually even care about >this thread, especially now that Bruce and others have given us numbers >that make most of the discussion moot. What annoys me is your constant >pounding on other people's credibility, especially since you don't ever >seem to accept anyone else's criticism of your credibility.
That's just Suffield being an annoying prick, as usual. Common consenus is that he's generally best ignored... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer
