On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:16:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > That wasn't my question. My question was, why should any ISV care if > their product has been LSB-*certified*? ISVs can test against, and > advertise support for, whatever they want to without getting the LSB's > imprimatur. I cannot fathom why any ISV would go through the expense (money > or time) of getting some sort of LSB certification instead of simply making > this part of their in-house product QA; and therefore I don't see how the > absence of LSB-certified applications can be regarded as a failure of the > LSB process.
I don't think we are talking about ISVs paying to get LSB certification but about ISVs certifying their own applications for a certain LSB level, aren't we? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
