On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 00:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Besides that the LCC sounds like an extraordinarily bad idea, passing > around binaries only makes sense if you can't easily reproduce them from > the source (which I defined very broadly to include all build scripts > and depencies), and that case is the worst possible thing a distribution > can get into.
The LCC core will be fully reproducible from source. You may (and probably will) lose any certifications if you do that, for the same reason that the distros reproduced from the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source (e.g., White Box Linux) lose them. But it won't be take it or leave it. If reproducing from source and/or modifying the core packages is more important to you than the certifications, you will be able to do that. -- Ian Murdock 317-578-8882 (office) http://www.progeny.com/ http://ianmurdock.com/ "All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible." -T.E. Lawrence
