Raul Miller wrote: > > On May 31, Galen Hazelwood wrote > > Perhaps. Anybody have any serious arguments? I think the reason we > > configure gcc as i486 is so it automatically optimizes for the 486; it's > > a good middle ground. > > If I remember right, configuring for pentium leaves an executable > that might not run on 386 or 486. >
If gcc actually _did_ any pentium optimizations, that might be true. Unfortunately, we don't get that until 2.8. (still waiting...) --Galen -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
