On Dec 12, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And why it should be different if that firmware is distributed by the > > manufacturer on a CD instead of a flash EPROM chip? > Because the user has to actively do something and taint his filesystem > with the non-free files from the CD. And why this whould be worse than having other parts of his computer "tainted"?
> If the system boots off the CD, loads the firmware and only then loads > the linux kernel then it would be different. How? -- ciao, | Marco | [9732 alA1GOpGQcP/.]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
