* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041212 19:35]: > Andi writes: > > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of > > the SC.
> The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. I didn't argue against that. I just said that the "preferred form of modification" is _not_ the language of the SC, but the language of one of the licenses that we consider as free. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
