Goswin von Brederlow wrote:Yes, but in that case the byte stream was the "preferred form of the work for making modifications to it" per the GPL. In the case of a BLOB, that's not the case.Apart from being ugly the above is perfectly legal and nothing speaks against adding it, _provided_ this is the source. I have actually seen GPL sources with such byte sequences in it for cases where the toolchain couldn't emit the right opcodes. The BLOB code was compiled and assembled at some time, from a source file you don't have. Thanks Bruce |
- Re: LCC and blobs Bruce Perens
- Re: LCC and blobs Brian Nelson
- Re: LCC and blobs Glenn Maynard
- Re: LCC and blobs Brian Nelson
- Re: LCC and blobs Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: LCC and blobs Bruce Perens
- Re: LCC and blobs Bruce Perens
- Re: LCC and blobs Glenn Maynard
- Re: LCC and blobs Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: LCC and blobs Bruce Perens
- Re: LCC and blobs Bruce Perens
- Re: LCC and blobs Goswin von Brederlow
- Are BLOBs source code? Bruce Perens
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Florian Weimer
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Florian Weimer
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Andreas Barth
- Re: Are BLOBs source code? Goswin von Brederlow