Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le samedi 11 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 13:51 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a Ãcrit :
> > > Why should this go on debian-legal? I think the legal status and
> > > DFSG-freeness of these firmwares is pretty clear.
> > 
> > Then it doesn't go anywhere.  It certainly isn't for debian-devel.
> 
> Of course it is. This is about how to deal with this situation,
> technically speaking.

What is the technical question here?  "Whether the package depends on
non-free software?"  "Whether an exception should be made for this
case?"  "Whether we should change our existing policies?"  All are for
debian-legal or debian-project.


Reply via email to