-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eric,
most cc:s removed - and I'm still thinking wether I should send this as a
private mail... anyway:
I'm sorry if I offended you with my summary mail about the current status of
quik and initrd-support. My aim is to help to get working oldworld support
for d-i (and sarge released ASAP). Since debian sarge defaults to kernel 2.6
on powerpc, initrd-support for quik is almost necessary. Two weeks ago p2 and
myself ("together" with two oldworld boxes ) met at a skolelinux-developer
meeting, where p2 implemented the initrd-code. I just took the task of
telling the world about it ;-)
I you think that me (or maybe p2) knows more about the current status of quik
than you do, feel free to ask. I will gladly answer your questions although I
doubt to know more than you - since all I know I posted in said summary
mails. As far as I know, p2 is "only" interested in fixing quik's code, but
not in maintaining/packaging it.
So, as far as I can see there is nothing to be angry about (anymore?). If you
still got a point, please tell - I don't want make the same mistakes twice.
regards,
Holger
P.S.. Do you need help in packaging a proper quik_2.0e-12.deb (or 2.0f?) ?
This is still needed (ASAP) for the d-i/release people to review the changes
and to be able to decide wether to allow it into sarge or not...
On Friday 03 December 2004 23:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ce jour Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Holger Levsen a dit:
>
> i'd appreciate not having it hijacked from under me. i don't mind
> getting help, and i do appreciate that, but i get the feeling it's being
> hijacked from me. you could at least tell me WTF is going on.
>
> eric
> (the current quik maintainer)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBtGGBUHLQNqxYNSARAolTAJ0eiLNJ8Etgoe6a46fZ4iTu1XNFoACg0XnW
ni/TXodVVCtA7N6tikt+i1I=
=oMJc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
