Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > great. since i meet other debian developers at the linux congress, i my > a big friend of a cvs server with all debian packages. does anyone have > a server with enough hard disks and a good conection to run it ?
Some problems arise: Should this CVS repository be mandatory, i.e. does every Debian package have to be there? How much disk space will this take ? > this could make some things much easier (i don't want to download the > whole source and diffs, to look at two or three files). > also it would > help to coordinate updates (think of the menu package - this way we > could have send diffs direct to the maintainer). My favourite example ;-) So I'll repeat this: IMHO Currently the overhead of fixing a bug and publishing the fixed version is too high. For unstable it would be enough to check-in the fix (e.g. an added menu file, a spelling-fix). Please note that the procedure for stable might be different. > there are also situations where several developers have to work > together. E.g. boot-floppies. I regularly receive patches from the people doing the ports to other architectures. If they could merge them into the CVS repository, they needn't wait until I released a new version. (Another example: We already used a CVS repository on master for the FAQ.) Sven -- Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .