Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:13:25AM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:36, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:23:21 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >> And how do we find who we are alienating? Oh, I know: lets have a > > >> GR. > > > > > Don't put words in my mouth. I hate GRs. > > > > That, unfortunately, may be the only recourse you have, if > > this thing ever gets packaged. > > You seem to be under the false impression I am vehemently against > packaging hot-babe. > > In reality, I only wanted people to consider the legal (rather than > ethical) consequences. Early in the thread the conversation was veering > off in stupid directions about whether or not it was sexist or whether > or not we want 13 year olds seeing it; I wanted to get it off of that. > > Since it seems that at least some people (such as yourself) have > considered it as a legal issue and think it not a problem, I am fine > supporting its entry into main, as I have stated elsewhere in this > thread. I am open to a common sense resolution of the issue -- provided > people are actually addressing the issue (which the vast majority of > participates in this thread are not). > > This will be my last post on this topic; it's wasted too much of > everyone's time already.
The only thing this thread has succeeded in doing for me is: a) making me go download, compile and run it b) adjust the threshold so I have to work for my reward c) thinking, wow, this is cool, i wish it was debianized so i didn't have to do step a P. --
