On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:34:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:53:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:32:18 +0000, Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > And we have no time to set up i judgement over content -- > > there is a clear criteria for inclusion of packages in Debian already. >
[ snip something about child porn ] > I for one do not think that the cause of including porn in Debian is > worth it. How many people here are willing to go to jail so that we can > include porn in main? > Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the inclusion of hot-babe in main. Now, can we stop this stupid debate about something that is clearly a non-technical issue and get on with doing what we do best? Oh wait, this is d-d, isn't it... Regards, Neil McGovern -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
