Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:01:06AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Then, Disk 1 (which is very full-featured, after all) can be
>> passed out where ever and to who ever, without any fear of
>> possible problems.
>
> Hard-coding a list of "unacceptable" packages into the CD building scripts
> is a waste of time, because the location of a package on a CD set is
> primarily determined by its importance to the system and by its popularity.
> Most of these packages are in danger of ending up on the first CD any time
> soon -- and, if they were, why should we be overriding the overwhelming
> preferences expressed by our users just to pander to the childish
> sensibilities of people who *aren't* our users?
Even worse with dvd images where nearly everything is on disc1.
MfG
Goswin
