Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To prevent this misunderstanding, perhaps change to > > For example, it is not sufficient reason to omit a file that it is > used only when buidling on MS-DOS. Similarly, a Makefile provided by > upstream should not be omitted even if the first thing your > debian/rules does is to overwrite it by running a configure script.
Thanks, I changed it further so that even people like me can easily get the grammar: ,---- | For example, it is not a sufficient reason for omitting a file that it | is used only when building on MS-DOS. Similarly, a Makefile provided | by upstream should not be omitted even if the first thing your | <file>debian/rules</file> does is to overwrite it by running a | configure script. `---- I hope it is still understandable for native speakers... > Some minor typos, most certainly originally made by me: Thanks, corrected. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
