On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:50:31PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:28 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > I haven't yet contacted Joey, however, since I'm still considering this > > option and how to do it best. One option, for example, is to do a NMU to > > experimental so other people can test the package (and verify that the bugs > > are actuall fixed) before uploading to sid. I have done this for other base > > packages (like ifupdown). I suggest you think about it (and the > > consequences of a broken^Wuntested upload at this point) before talking > > with him. > We'll see that in due time. I have lots of other things to do.
I'm sure you do. I have been telling you (and you've ignored) some steps you can do to help. Since you previously said: > Could someone go through the list and NMU this? I'm willing to help, if > necessary. If you have information, please send it to the BTS, that's the place maintainers look for information related to bugs. You shouldn't expect people to review the -devel archives everytime they want to find information related to a bug, do you? If you can provide more help (besides adding information to the bugs in the BTS) you could prepare or test patches for those bugs you care for. Replying in a public mailing list is not the kind of help that would move forward a fix. Regards Javier ObBug: 41801 54967 54999 69754 70557 76209 90486 110732 116162 118647 132401 140776 146819 150423 150423 150423 159708 160454 165098 166531 166713 166943 173746 173938 174181 194502 203578 206205 210516 215855 219206 220382 225087 228031 228258 228688 230020 243681 253508 262941 263224 267112 272581 [Modutils NMU to experimental, yes, I'm breaking the rule since those aren't RC and I'm not fixing them in sid, but you get the point]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
