I wrote: > I see no reason for new packages to ever go into volatile. Such things > belong in backports.
Jesus Climent writes: > You seem to have missed a very important ground of volatile: add new > packages in a controled way when backporting code to the version in > stable is far more difficult than guarantee a new version being stable > enough to be updated. New versions of packages already in Stable are not new packages. Clamav 1.0 would be a new version. BetterVirusGetter would be a new package. -- John Hasler
