On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:09 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > This was discussed before: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2003/07/msg00176.html
Mailing to d-g-g, CCing d-d. My comments below. > And see also Debian GNOME Packaging Policy: > http://www.burtonini.com/computing/gnome-policy-20030502-1.html > > Quote: "Panel Applets. TODO: Panel applets -- "gnome-applet-foo" > or "foo-applet" or "gnome-foo-applet?" > > I ran apt-rdepends on libpanel-applet2-0 and weeded out full > applications which happened to provide applets. The result follows: > > "foo" style: > apt-watch > bubblemon > flink > glunarclock > gxmms > netapplet > netspeed > teatime > > "foo-applet" style > gtodo-applet > imhangul-status-applet > lock-keys-applet > mboxcheck-applet > netmon-applet > quick-lounge-applet > rhythmbox-applet > seti-applet > xpenguins-applet > > "gnome-foo-applet" style: > gnome-cpufreq-applet > gnome-netstatus-applet > gnome-randr-applet > gnome-swallow-applet > > "foo-gnome" style: > verbiste-gnome > oooqstart-gnome > > "gnome-foo" style: > gnome-blog > gnome-pilot > > "foo-applet-gnome" style: > uim-applet-gnome > > Which is, not consistent. I don't like "netspeed" package name, which is > too generic, while its upstream name is "netspeed_applet". See > http://mfcn.ilo.de/netspeed_applet/ . Personally, I prefer gnome-foo-applet. In the cases where the applet name contains "gnome" or "applet" it can be re-arranged. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
