On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:44:55PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote: > ``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them royal people, > so > I take it you meant to say: > > Adamantix is not what I want to do, what I want to do is to improve Debian.
That is correct, I agree with Russell. What _I_ want to do is improve Debian. if for a while I have to go it alone and demonstrate mycode and pacakges work then so be it, but the ultimate aim is to improve Debian. > Fair enough. But if I were to improve Debian, I would put PaX in the default > kernel source. PaX is interesting, ProPolice is more interesting. > > > create installation CDs yourselve. For more information about Adamantix, > > > see http://trusteddebian.org/ > > That URL is obsolete. Yes. > Right, it is obsolete. Please use http://www.adamantix.org/ instead. Not that > it makes any difference, because you end up with the same web page in front > of you. But you loose the association with Debian "proper". > > In fact the domain should probably be de-registered to avoid confusion. > > If anyone appears to be confused here, it seems to be you (again). Fight amongst yourself if you wish. Adamantix are clear that they are seprate from Debian as I believe they are. Anything else is pointless bickering and semantics. Steve --
