On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:01:20PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > On 2003-12-01 14:45 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Another possibility is to just drop packages that aren't maintained well > > enough. While this is somewhat attractive, it doesn't really serve our > > users any better than saying "Why don't we just lower our standards?" > Basically I agree that instantly dropping 'bad' packages (or, worse, > doing it automatically) is not the best option for users. But OTOH it > cannot be the best solution neither to keep them forever, begging > people to fix them without any success.
Sure. The best solution is to beg people to fix them _with_ success. Please focus your attentions in that direction. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
pgpk7TnFq5RrA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
